The argument surrounding the legalization of euthanasia

Introduction In a issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association, an article titled "It's Over Debbie" describes how an anonymous doctor administers a fatal dose of morphine to a woman dying of ovarian cancer Anonymous, In a issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, ten doctors associated with the nation's leading hospitals and medical schools declare their belief that "it is not immoral for a physician to assist in the rational suicide of a terminally ill person" Wanzer, et.

The argument surrounding the legalization of euthanasia

This argument The argument surrounding the legalization of euthanasia that euthanasia is bad because of the sanctity of human life. The fact that we are human has value in itself. We exist, so we have value. We must respect our own value It applies to us too.

To do that is not to respect our inherent worth. Top The slippery slope Many people worry that if voluntary euthanasia were to become legal, it would not be long before involuntary euthanasia would start to happen.

We concluded that it was virtually impossible to ensure that all acts of euthanasia were truly voluntary and that any liberalisation of the law in the United Kingdom could not be abused.

We were also concerned that vulnerable people - the elderly, lonely, sick or distressed - would feel pressure, whether real or imagined, to request early death. In general form it says that if we allow something relatively harmless today, we may start a trend that results in something currently unthinkable becoming accepted.

Those who oppose this argument say that properly drafted legislation can draw a firm barrier across the slippery slope. Various forms of the slippery slope argument If we change the law and accept voluntary euthanasia, we will not be able to keep it under control.

Proponents of euthanasia say: Euthanasia would never be legalised without proper regulation and control mechanisms in place Doctors may soon start killing people without bothering with their permission.

The law is able to deal with the possibility of self-defence or suicide being used as disguises for murder. It will thus be able to deal with this case equally well To dress murder up as euthanasia will involve medical co-operation.

The need for a conspiracy will make it an unattractive option Many are needlessly condemned to suffering by the chief anti-euthanasia argument: The subtext is that some lives are not worth living. Not only does this put the sick or disabled at risk, it also downgrades their status as human beings while they are alive.

Some societies have regarded people with disabilities as inferior, or as a burden on society. Others go further still and say that those who are a burden on society should be eliminated. Some examples are listed below: They say that most of these problems can be identified by assessing the patient properly, and, if necessary, the system should discriminate against the opinions of people who are particularly vulnerable.

Chochinov and colleagues found that fleeting or occasional thoughts of a desire for death were common in a study of people who were terminally ill, but few patients expressed a genuine desire for death. Will to live in the terminally ill. Other people have rights too Euthanasia is usually viewed from the viewpoint of the person who wants to die, but it affects other people too, and their rights should be considered.

It includes compassion and support for family and friends. Competent palliative care may well be enough to prevent a person feeling any need to contemplate euthanasia. You matter because you are you. You matter to the last moment of your life and we will do all we can to help you die peacefully, but also to live until you die.

Dame Cicely Saunders, founder of the modern hospice movement The key to successful palliative care is to treat the patient as a person, not as a set of symptoms, or medical problems. The World Health Organisation states that palliative care affirms life and regards dying as a normal process; it neither hastens nor postpones death; it provides relief from pain and suffering; it integrates the psychological and spiritual aspects of the patient.

Palliative care aims to enhance the quality of life for the family as well as the patient. Effective palliative care gives the patient and their loved ones a chance to spend quality time together, with as much distress removed as possible. They can if they want to use this time to bring any unfinished business in their lives to a proper closure and to say their last goodbyes.

The argument surrounding the legalization of euthanasia

Palliative care should aim to make it easier and more attractive for family and friends to visit the dying person. A survey USA showed that terminally ill patients actually spent the vast majority of their time on their own, with few visits from medical personnel or family members.

Spiritual care Spiritual care may be important even for non-religious people. Spiritual care should be interpreted in a very wide sense, since patients and families facing death often want to search for the meaning of their lives in their own way. Palliative care and euthanasia Good palliative care is the alternative to euthanasia.

If it was available to every patient, it would certainly reduce the desire for death to be brought about sooner. But providing palliative care can be very hard work, both physically and psychologically. This may tempt people away from palliative care. Legalising euthanasia may reduce the availability of palliative care Some fear that the introduction of euthanasia will reduce the availability of palliative care in the community, because health systems will want to choose the most cost effective ways of dealing with dying patients.Basic Arguments About Euthanasia.

Beliefs about Euthanasia: Both Sides of the Euthanasia Controversy This is a highly technical argument, and it's only relevant to people who accept that passive euthanasia is sometimes right.

The argument says that there is no real difference between passive and active euthanasia, and so if we accept . What are the arguments against legalization of Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia? by Robert D. Orr, MD, CM Today's Christian Doctor - Summer The Slippery-Slope Argument Against Euthanasia Revisited slippery slope" argument against the legalization of principle why regulations surrounding patient consent and what counts as.

The Argument For The Ontological Argument - For many, the idea of existence as a predicate causes issues for the ontological argument. In the argument Anselm states that God is a being, than which nothing greater can be conceived, and using logic he comes to . ] Euthanasia is a nonpartisan, nonprofit website that presents research, studies, and pro and con statements on questions about euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide and related end-of-life issues.

Some people find our use of the phrase "physician-assisted suicide" inaccurate and inappropriate, and they suggest we use . California’s Gov. Brown has signed AB , a new law that amends the state’s prohibition on aiding, advising, or encouraging another to commit suicide. “ Californians took their lives in under physician-assisted suicide law” (Los Angeles Times — June 22, ).

Euthanasia -