Cover letter scientific journal revision

Obtained enormous global visibility and tremendous response from the authors and readers from all over the world inspired the publisher to maintain reputed Open Access Journals in various scientific disciplines. The journals have over 15 million readers and the reputation and success earned can be attributed to the strong Editorial Board which contains over 50, eminent personalities that ensure a rapid, qualitative and quick review process. More than International Societies are supporting in making scientific information Open Access.

Cover letter scientific journal revision

Baumeister Dear Sir, Madame, or Other: We have again rewritten the entire manuscript from start to finish. We even changed the goddamn running head!

Hopefully we have suffered enough by now to satisfy even you and your bloodthirsty reviewers. I shall skip the usual point-by-point description of every single change we made in response to the critiques.

After all, it is fairly clear that your reviewers are less interested in details of scientific procedure than in working out their personality problems and sexual frustrations by seeking some kind of demented glee in the sadistic and arbitrary exercise of tyrannical power over helpless authors like ourselves who happen to fall into their clutches.

Still, from this batch of reviewers, C was clearly the most hostile, and we request that you not ask him or her to review this revision.

JFS Author Guidelines -

Indeed, we have mailed letter bombs to four or five people we suspected of being reviewer C, so if you send the manuscript back to them the review process could be unduly delayed. For example, if as review C suggested several of my recent ancestors were indeed drawn from other species, it is too late to change that.

Other suggestions were implemented, however, and the paper has improved and benefited. Thus, you suggested that we shorten the manuscript by 5 pages, and we were able to accomplish this very effectively by altering the margins and printing the paper in a different font with a smaller typeface. We agree with you that the paper is much better this way.

One perplexing problem was dealing with suggestions by Reviewer B. These were on a variety of different topics, none of which had any relevance to our work that we could see. Indeed, one was an essay on the Spanish-American War from a high school literary magazine.

The only common thread was that all 16 were by the same author, presumably someone whom Reviewer B greatly admires and feels should be more widely cited.

Cover letter scientific journal revision

To handle this, we have modified the Introduction and added, after the review of relevant literature, a subsection entitled "Review of Irrelevant Literature" that discusses these articles and also duly addresses some of the more asinine suggestions in the other reviews.

We hope that you will be pleased with this revision and will finally recognize how urgently deserving of publication this work is. If not, then you are an unscrupulous, depraved monster with no shred of human decency.

You ought to be in a cage. May whatever heritage you come from be the butt of the next round of ethnic jokes. If you do accept it, however, we wish to thank you for your patience and wisdom throughout this process and to express our appreciation of your scholarly insights.

To repay you, we would be happy to review some manuscripts for you; please send us the next manuscript that any of these reviewers submits to your journal.

Assuming you accept this paper, we would also like to add a footnote acknowledging your help with this manuscript and to point out that we liked the paper much better the way we originally wrote it but you held the editorial shotgun to our heads and forced us to chop, reshuffle, restate, hedge, expand, shorten, and in general convert a meaty paper into stir-fried vegetables.JEL Classification Codes Guide.

Overview of JBC’s publication process

The guide provides JEL Code application guidelines, keywords, and examples of items within each classification. A good cover letter can help to “sell” your manuscript to the journal editor.

A sample cover letter for your next manuscript revision at a peer-review journal. This letter is archived at the University of Pennsylvania Humor Page are the answers.. Cover Letter with Manuscript Revision. About ICMJE. The ICMJE is a small group of general medical journal editors and representatives of selected related organizations working together to improve the quality of . Manuscript revision is an integral part of journal publication. This article contains useful tips for authors submitting a revised manuscript and cover letter to a journal. Getting your work published in a peer-reviewed journal almost always involves revising your manuscript at least once.

As well as introducing your work to the editor you can also take this opportunity to explain why the manuscript will be of interest to a journal's readers, something which is always as the forefront editors’ mind.

You have worked hard to prepare your manuscript for submission to a journal you have chosen carefully. Now, introduce your manuscript with a great cover ashio-midori.comgh many authors hastily compose this document, the cover letter can make or break your chances of publication: it can make the difference between being granted a peer review and .

A sample cover letter for your next manuscript revision at a peer-review journal. This letter is archived at the University of Pennsylvania Humor Page are the answers..

Sakarya University Journal of Science

Cover Letter with Manuscript Revision. JEL Classification Codes Guide. The guide provides JEL Code application guidelines, keywords, and examples of items within each classification. Here is the list of words starting with Letter S in

Sample Cover Letter for Journal Manuscript Resubmissions - Academia Obscura